# Top 10 Algorithms for Coding Interview

The following are the common subjects in coding interviews. As understanding those concepts requires much more effort, this tutorial only serves as an introduction. The subjects that are covered include: 1) String/Array/Matrix, 2) Linked List, 3) Tree, 4) Heap, 5) Graph, 6) Sorting, 7) Dynamic Programming, 8) Bit Manipulation, 9) Combinations and Permutations, and 10) Math Problems. I highly recommend you to read "Simple Java" first, if you need a brief review of Java basics. If you want to see code examples that show how to use a popular API, you can use JavaSED.com.

1. String/Array

An algorithm problem's input is often a string or array. Without auto-completion of any IDE, the following methods should be remembered.

```toCharArray() //get char array of a String charAt(int x) //get a char at the specific index length() //string length length //array size substring(int beginIndex) substring(int beginIndex, int endIndex) Integer.valueOf()//string to integer String.valueOf()/integer to string Arrays.sort() //sort an array Arrays.toString(char[] a) //convert to string Arrays.copyOf(T[] original, int newLength) System.arraycopy(Object src, int srcPos, Object dest, int destPos, int length)```

2. Matrix

Common methods to solve matrix related problem include DFS, BFS, dynamic programming, etc.

The implementation of a linked list is pretty simple in Java. Each node has a value and a link to next node.

```class Node { int val; Node next;   Node(int x) { val = x; next = null; } }```

Two popular applications of linked list are stack and queue.

Stack

```class Stack{ Node top;   public Node peek(){ if(top != null){ return top; }   return null; }   public Node pop(){ if(top == null){ return null; }else{ Node temp = new Node(top.val); top = top.next; return temp; } }   public void push(Node n){ if(n != null){ n.next = top; top = n; } } }```

Queue

```class Queue{ Node first, last;   public void enqueue(Node n){ if(first == null){ first = n; last = first; }else{ last.next = n; last = n; } }   public Node dequeue(){ if(first == null){ return null; }else{ Node temp = new Node(first.val); first = first.next; return temp; } } }```

The Java standard library contains a class called "Stack". Another class from Java SDK is LinkedList, which can be used as a Queue (add() and remove()). (LinkedList implements the Queue interface.) If a stack or queue is required to solve problems during your interview, they are ready to be used.

4. Tree, Heap and Trie

A tree normally refers to a binary tree. Each node contains a left node and right node like the following:

```class TreeNode{ int value; TreeNode left; TreeNode right; }```

Here are some concepts related with trees:

1. Binary Search Tree: for all nodes, left children <= current node <= right children
2. Balanced vs. Unbalanced: In a balanced tree, the depth of the left and right subtrees of every node differ by 1 or less.
3. Full Binary Tree: every node other than the leaves has two children.
4. Perfect Binary Tree: a full binary tree in which all leaves are at the same depth or same level, and in which every parent has two children.
5. Complete Binary Tree: a binary tree in which every level, except possibly the last, is completely filled, and all nodes are as far left as possible

Heap is a specialized tree-based data structure that satisfies the heap property. The time complexity of its operations are important (e.g., find-min, delete-min, insert, etc). In Java, PriorityQueue is important to know.

4.1 Tree

4.2 Heap

4.3 Trie

4.4 Segment Tree

5. Graph

Graph related questions mainly focus on depth first search and breath first search. Depth first search is straightforward, you can just loop through neighbors starting from the root node.

Below is a simple implementation of a graph and breath first search. The key is using a queue to store nodes.

1) Define a GraphNode

```class GraphNode{ int val; GraphNode next; GraphNode[] neighbors; boolean visited;   GraphNode(int x) { val = x; }   GraphNode(int x, GraphNode[] n){ val = x; neighbors = n; }   public String toString(){ return "value: "+ this.val; } }```

2) Define a Queue

```class Queue{ GraphNode first, last;   public void enqueue(GraphNode n){ if(first == null){ first = n; last = first; }else{ last.next = n; last = n; } }   public GraphNode dequeue(){ if(first == null){ return null; }else{ GraphNode temp = new GraphNode(first.val, first.neighbors); first = first.next; return temp; } } }```

3) Breath First Search uses a Queue

```public class GraphTest {   public static void main(String[] args) { GraphNode n1 = new GraphNode(1); GraphNode n2 = new GraphNode(2); GraphNode n3 = new GraphNode(3); GraphNode n4 = new GraphNode(4); GraphNode n5 = new GraphNode(5);   n1.neighbors = new GraphNode[]{n2,n3,n5}; n2.neighbors = new GraphNode[]{n1,n4}; n3.neighbors = new GraphNode[]{n1,n4,n5}; n4.neighbors = new GraphNode[]{n2,n3,n5}; n5.neighbors = new GraphNode[]{n1,n3,n4};   breathFirstSearch(n1, 5); }   public static void breathFirstSearch(GraphNode root, int x){ if(root.val == x) System.out.println("find in root");   Queue queue = new Queue(); root.visited = true; queue.enqueue(root);   while(queue.first != null){ GraphNode c = (GraphNode) queue.dequeue(); for(GraphNode n: c.neighbors){   if(!n.visited){ System.out.print(n + " "); n.visited = true; if(n.val == x) System.out.println("Find "+n); queue.enqueue(n); } } } } }```

Output:

value: 2 value: 3 value: 5 Find value: 5
value: 4

6. Sorting

Time complexity of different sorting algorithms. You can go to wiki to see basic idea of them.

 Algorithm Average Time Worst Time Space Bubble sort n^2 n^2 1 Selection sort n^2 n^2 1 Insertion sort n^2 n^2 Quick sort n log(n) n^2 Merge sort n log(n) n log(n) depends

* BinSort, Radix Sort and CountSort use different set of assumptions than the rest, and so they are not "general" sorting methods. (Thanks to Fidel for pointing this out)

Here are some implementations/demos, and in addition, you may want to check out how Java developers sort in practice.
1) Mergesort
2) Quicksort
3) InsertionSort.
4) Maximum Gap (Bucket Sort)
5) Sort Colors (Counting Sort)

7. Dynamic Programming

Dynamic programming is a technique for solving problems with the following properties:

1. An instance is solved using the solutions for smaller instances.
2. The solution for a smaller instance might be needed multiple times.
3. The solutions to smaller instances are stored in a table, so that each smaller instance is solved only once.
4. Additional space is used to save time.


The problem of climbing steps perfectly fit those 4 properties. Therefore, it can be solve by using dynamic programming.

```public static int[] A = new int[100];   public static int f3(int n) { if (n <= 2) A[n]= n;   if(A[n] > 0) return A[n]; else A[n] = f3(n-1) + f3(n-2);//store results so only calculate once! return A[n]; }```

8. Bit Manipulation

Bit operators:

 OR (|) AND (&) XOR (^) Left Shift (<<) Right Shift (>>) Not (~) 1|0=1 1&0=0 1^0=1 0010<<2=1000 1100>>2=0011 ~1=0

Get bit i for a give number n. (i count from 0 and starts from right)

```public static boolean getBit(int num, int i){ int result = num & (1<<i);   if(result == 0){ return false; }else{ return true; } }```

For example, get second bit of number 10.

i=1, n=10
1<<1= 10 1010&10=10 10 is not 0, so return true;

9. Combinations and Permutations

The difference between combination and permutation is whether order matters.

Example 1:

Given 5 numbers - 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, print out different sequence of the 5 numbers. 4 can not be the third one, 3 and 5 can not be adjacent. How many different combinations?

Example 2:

Given 5 banaba, 4 pear, and 3 apple, assuming one kind of fruit are the same, how many different combinations?

10. Math

Solving math problems usually require us to find regularities or repeated pattern from the observations. List the results for a small set of numbers first, if you do not have any ideas.

UPDATE: I decided to add more categories below.

11. HashMap

1) Shortest Word Distance II

1. Share your code to Github/BitBucket

Category >> Algorithms >> Interview
If you want someone to read your code, please put the code inside <pre><code> and </code></pre> tags. For example:
```<pre><code>
String foo = "bar";
</code></pre>
```
1. GEEK on 2013-11-26

I think the worst-case running time of counting sort is O(N+K), according to the book .

2. Talgar on 2013-11-26

Thank you !

3. jly on 2013-11-27

For #9 Probability, I think there is a typo in the description. It should be 365/365 * … (the probability should be the product, not the sum)

4. ryanlr on 2013-11-27

Thousands of people have visited this page, you are the only one who points this out! Thank you.

5. Hengfeng Luo on 2013-11-27

for #9 probablity, C(50,2) * (1/365)*(1/365)

6. charles on 2013-11-27

toCharyArray? I guess autocompletion might be useful.

7. Phil on 2013-11-27

For #6, shouldn’t the line after
f(3) + f(2) + f(2) + f(1)
Be
f(2) + f(1) + f(2) + f(2) + f(1)
Then you’re done, because n <= 2 returns the value?

8. not-just-yeti on 2013-11-28

Rather a nit-pick, but fwiw: what you call dynamic programming is really just “memoization”.

DP is memoization plus an add’l optimization: don’t memoize the entire table of other-inputs; instead try to be clever and only keep some portion of that table, and calculate in a way that you only need refer to that portion. (For Fibonacci, that the DP version only keeps the last two elements of the array. In other problems, rather than keep an entire 2-D array you might keep just the last column of that array, or just the last three columns, if that’s as far as the recursion needs to go.)

9. Fidel on 2013-11-29

“Bin Sort” is lacking in the sorting algorithms, as well as “Radix sort”!! And “Heap Sort” as well.

Besides, I would have put “Count Sort” after all the other methods, and after “Bin Sort” and “Radix Sort”, because the three of them (BinSort, Radix Sort and CountSort) use a different set of assumptions than the rest, and so they are not “general” sorting methods.

10. Mambo on 2013-12-12

So after asking all that stuff: how often in your professional career did you have to implement a linked list? Or graphs? Once? Twice? Nice things to ask, but not too practically relevant IMHO.

Recursion can be useful, but what you don’t mention and don’t ask: how expensive is recursion? I’ve seen more than enough people coming from university trying to solve everything with recursion – resulting in bad to read, slow and memory expensive code. Every recursion creates a copy of the recursive function in memory(in most languages). And recursion almost always is slower than the iterative solution.

11. Joe Pepersack on 2014-1-12

These are horrible – if typical – interview questions. Asking horrible programming questions will get you horrible programmers.

I’ve been developing software professionally for 25 years. If someone asked me how I would implement a linked list, my answer would be “I wouldn’t. I’d a) develop in a language which supports lists natively or b) use a library.

If your interview tests people on their ability to reinvent wheels, you’re going to get programmers who are good at reinventing wheels. You want your interview questions to test a candidate’s ability to solve problems and make smart design decisions. Reinventing the wheel is almost never a smart design decision.

12. ryanlr on 2014-2-7

Large companies (e.g., Google, Facebook, or other similar levels) test developers’ knowledge of algorithm and data structure. That’s the essence of coding interview.

13. Joe Pepersack on 2014-2-7

I’ve interviewed with industry-leading companies.
I’ve worked for industry-leading companies.
I’ve interviewed candidates for industry-leading companies.

The top companies want candidates who can SOLVE PROBLEMS EFFICIENTLY. They could care less if you know how to implement a breadth-first search, because that’s a solved problem. Even if you don’t have a suitable library for your platform, the expectation for a senior developer is that you can pick up a textbook and implement it.

What they DO care about is if you know how to select the correct data structures and algorithms to solve a problem, and do so efficiently and professionally – which means means writing legible, maintainable code that follows best practices like code reuse.

Re-implementing basic library functions would be a GUARANTEED way to fail an interview for a top company. If I give you an interview problem that requires you to count the number of distinct values in an input set, I’m testing you on your ability to recognize that you need to use a hash table, not on your ability to come up with an ad-hoc implementation of a hash table. Rolling your own hash table would be just as much of a fail as using the wrong data structure.

Reinventing the wheel is bad engineering. If you hire engineers based on their ability to reinvent wheels, you are by definition hiring bad engineers.

14. ryanlr on 2014-2-7

Thanks a lot for your comments. I agree. But those questions are indeed asked during interviews. Hope the interviewers have the same point of view as you and ask better questions.

15. Joe Pepersack on 2014-2-7

Yes, the posted questions are VERY typical of the questions that get asked by clueless interviewers at second-rate organizations.

And then they wonder why they hire programmers who write slow, buggy, and unmaintainable code. They scratch their heads why their products are delivered late, are unreliable, and won’t scale. They wonder why the top talent turns down their offers.

This article is a shining example of how NOT to interview programmers and what questions NOT to ask. In all honesty, I’d walk out of an interview that asked these kind of questions, because it’s obvious to me that they have no clue what they’re doing. It speaks volumes about their corporate culture, and none of it is positive.

16. chen gao on 2014-2-11

I totally agree with you, but the problem is that if you only offer some questions about your company’s products or software, it’s really hard for them who have never done an internship in this company or never used these software. Maybe they only use these algorithm problems only to test wether this guy is qualified after a short training in the company.

17. Le Trung Kien on 2014-3-6

I don’t know why some people keep complaining about how big companies conduct interviews, as if they know the optimal way. It is very similar to students who do not contend with the way professors give exams.

18. Wei Qiu on 2014-3-10

Recursion is not hard to read. Recursion frequently leads to elegant and compact solutions. Check Sedgewick’s implementation of Left Leaning RB tree as an example. For me recursion is the most natural way to tackle hard problems. Recursion is generally more powerful than iteration. Iteration is just an extra optimization step when you get the solution right.

19. Wei Qiu on 2014-3-10

For me, knowing about how to reinvent stuff is the only way to really understand how stuff works.
These are the basics. Knowledge of them doesn’t make people awful programmers. Lacking knowledge of engineering does.

20. Gabriel Ramírez on 2014-4-2

great post! really

21. kazoompa on 2014-4-9

I am 100% with Joe. I’ve also done two decades of programming and never found most of the above questions too relevant. These days most people Google for the API’s or algorithms, you can’t know them all by heart or better still, some languages incorporate them in their grammar. Problem solving and the choosing the proper strategy is a lot more important.

22. Johan Stén on 2014-4-9

Decades of programming experience here as well, highly technical at that. Low-level, technical, algorithmical stuff. I’ve never had any use for 99% of all the stuff that comes up in so called “competitive programming”. At best, this is masturbation. It’s not programming, it’s not what programming is about, it’s not what programmers spend their time on. It’s jerking off.

I took part in a programming competition where the qualifying round was something akin to this. The final round however was a “real life” programing task, where you had spend hours, to ship code that actually did something useful. None of the “competitive programmer” types ended up anywhere near the top.

Do I enjoy it? Highly. Does it have anything to do with what I get paid for? No.

23. Johan Stén on 2014-4-9

“Q. Other insights from the studies you’ve already done?

A. On the hiring side, we found that brainteasers are a complete waste of time. How many golf balls can you fit into an airplane? How many gas stations in Manhattan? A complete waste of time. They don’t predict anything. They serve primarily to make the interviewer feel smart.”

24. serge on 2014-4-10

Design patterns are also solved problems. Do you want to hire someone who doesn’t know about them?

25. minus Seven on 2014-4-11

This is true. But most companies don’t want to spend so time on evaluating candidates perfectly. These are just ways to weed out as many candidates as possible so that they can reduce the number of choices of potential hires.

Still most companies insist on them and as an interview candidate it is important to know them enough to be able to solve them. Interviews are hardly perfect these days.

26. hardsoft on 2014-4-11

When interviewing individuals for an embedded position, I might ask them to write a swap function because it is a simple and quick way to gauge their understanding of pointer operations and can lead into good conversation.

An embedded programmer needs to have a rock solid foundation in C or will have a steep learning curve.

So technical questions can be useful to judge a candidates knowledge. If you walked out, I would (probably rightly) assume you are a primadonna who would end up writing slow, buggy, and unmaintainable code because you would not have the fundamentals to perform your job.

27. John on 2014-4-11

In an embedded field is ok to ask about these topics, as reinventing the wheel in embedded C is pretty usual, but for higher level applications these kind of questions don’t give any good qualifiers, apart from theoretical ones. E.g. would be a lot better if newbie C++ developers knew how to properly use containers and algorithms than knowing how to implement by hand a double linked list or a tree. A good example is this talk: http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/GoingNative/2013/Cpp-Seasoning

28. Paul on 2014-4-12

Maybe that’s why you don’t work for a fortune 500 company.

29. Виктор Маслов on 2014-4-12

Looks like you are making horrible bad code of totally boring and useless software for 25 years, because you didn’t even realize, that these questions aren’t about data structures implementation but about algorithms of work with them.

30. abossard on 2014-4-12

I basically agree, it doesn’t make sense in most companies, to reinvent the square wheel all the time. I had an interview with a startup that asked my how to implement a Hash-table …. in the end they didn’t know anything about my problem solving skills and ended up explaining a Hash-table to me. Still they were interested in me taking the job.

But for companies which are driven by algorithms, like Google or Facebook, it does make sense, to check whether the applicant know these things. Not to implement it by heart, but because the questions they asked are related to such algorithms. They don’t ask to implement a linked list, but they may asked how to detect a cycle in a linked list, or the start of the cycle. They want to see whether you can use the basic knowledge about algorithms to solve problems.

To know the algorithms by heart is one part, but to apply that knowledge to solve trick-questions, that’s what they want to see.

In the end, I know I’m not a good or bad programmer just by this knowledge, but I want that Job at Google 🙂

31. Vinz on 2014-4-13

Hi Joe,
I am a Grad Student and preparing for the interviews..
I completely agree with you, however in my past experience when i told the interviewer the similar answer just just posted ! he glared at me and then i got rejected 🙁

32. Joe Pepersack on 2014-4-14

No, they just hire me as a consultant at \$200/hr.

33. Jitendra Sangar on 2014-5-5

A collection of problems asked in interviews
http://algorithmsandme.blogspot.in/p/blog-page_27.html

34. Drew on 2014-5-8

I find it funny that there is so much bashing about how these problems don’t really tell the interviewer anything other than being able to jump through some hoops. I completely disagree with those sentiments. Having problems such as these while trivial for some, can quickly weed out those who don’t have fundamental understanding of basic data structure concepts or classic algorithms. Sure, there are libraries for such things to hide away the gory details, but if you blindly just use them without knowing when they apply, you get into bad habits. These classical problems also gives a common baseline in which to judge applicants. It’s not a perfect system, nothing is, but it’s unrealistic for employers to devise more relevant questions because in any new job, there is going to be a learning curve no matter how much someone prepares.

Another thing to consider, these are computer science type of questions, applicable to a coder. Software Engineering is much more than just algorithms and encompasses the entire process of writing good software. I don’t believe this site advertises those type of questions because they can be much more subjective and open for great debate.

One more thing. As someone who has programmed embedded systems, I’m not always afforded the luxury of using libraries for various business/legal reasons. Without the crutch of someone already doing the work for you, one must be knowledgeable enough to use classic algorithms and shape it to meet the necessary solution.

35. Aarohi Shirke on 2014-5-30

For more IT interview questions you can check with skillgun @ http://skillgun.com truly helpful for your preparation

36. WJ on 2014-6-1

37. James on 2014-6-5
38. Walt Corey on 2014-6-6

Apparently Facebook also tests developers ability to program while getting intoxicated, see “Social Network”. I agree 100% with Joe. I was once asked, either by Google or Amazon how’d I’d implement a stack in Java. I said I would instanciate an instance of the java Stack() object I didn’t get the job.

39. Walt Corey on 2014-6-6

Joe, you touched on the answer. These questions are asked by people who, otherwise don’t know how to interview a candidate. I’d go so far as to say it is a gotcha. That may be a tad unfair. I was also interviewed at a startup and one question was what is the second argument to a hashmap constructor. I answered I was pretty sure it was capacity but as I use a smart IDE I let the IDE prompt me for the parameters. I focus on solving the business problem not memorizing parameter sequences.

40. Walt Corey on 2014-6-6

Not at all, those two scenarios are nothing alike. A student has absolutely no standing to question the professor. Professors generally have 90 semester hours in the subject the student maybe has 3 in. An interviewee with 20 years experience generally has 10 years or more experience than the person interviewing them.

41. Walt Corey on 2014-6-6

It absolutely can be but it can also blow a stack wide open. The goal is to have software that doesn’t program check at the customer’s site, not elegate to the eyes of the developer.

42. Walt Corey on 2014-6-6

that’s because the other 1,999 people didn’t care.

43. Walt Corey on 2014-6-6

Knowing how they apply is a vastly different problem than how to implement them. As a previous poster wrote about never using a graph or never having to implement a RB tree that’s different than having an understanding of why they are important. It’s a 5 minute answer verses a 40 minute exercise.

44. Guest on 2014-6-20

In top software companies ( google, fb, amazon, ms, etcetera) you will face this kind if questions because what they want to see it’s not only if you can solve the problem but HOW did you solve it. That’s exactly what they want to evaluate, they want to see what questions you asked to understand the problem, how did you analyze it, how you decomposed the problem, how you transformed your analysis and ideas into code, how good is your code (readable, maintainable, flexible). So the questions are not all about algorithms but they are also about your skills

45. Kenneth on 2014-7-20

Yes Google and Facebook do ask these questions, but not for the reason you believed.

I have friends in G and FB. They told me that they spent <1% of their time solving problems like "detecting cycle in linkedlist". It doesn't seem to be a wise thing to ask 90% of such questions interviews.

The reason why they asked these questions was that they did know a better way to objectively evaluate candidate's real design and coding skills. So they fell back to the questions they were asked at school.

46. ISuckatProgramming on 2014-7-30

Having done more than 20 or more tech interviews during a job search recently, I’ve found the lists in this post to be very useful. Most companies like Google or Linkedin will first give you a phone screen and there you will encounter 2 or 3 questions of the variety found here. Once you survive that and get to the in person interview, then that’s where the REAL fun begins. You typically get much harder programming problems and have much less them to finish them. I guess most developers at Google or Facebook must be geniuses or something, I guess this is a good way to weed out all the people of only average intelligence. 🙁

47. Guest on 2014-9-5

Well said.

48. atlas on 2014-10-15

I am a Java learner, and i like your articles very much. So,can i reprint your some wonderful articles to my blog（http://zhangxiaolong.org/）? Sometimes, i need to translate some articles to Chinese,and someone can understand contents os article.
Hope to get your permit.
Have a good day!

49. ryanlr on 2014-10-15

Sure, you are welcome to do that, but remember to give me a back link:)

50. Henry on 2014-10-19

GREAT work! Incredible useful for a quick review before an interview =)

51. Özge başak on 2014-10-20

Thanks for the great article. i really appreciate it. I have been making research on the internet for a very long time and now come up with something useful. it will be a great guide for my thesis here:

52. Oscar M on 2014-11-10

Although I do agree reinventing the wheel will get you nowhere and actually no one expects you to do it on the job, regardless I believe this is still a valid interview question to me. Why? Because even you said you want a candidate which has great problem solving skills and makes smart design decisions.

And this is nothing more than a problem which needs to be resolved, and by asking this you are looking for someone that can invent a wheel when needed.

Yes I agree that better questions could be asked, for example something like these Java programming tests, they are focused on examining the candidate’s problem solving skills.

But nevertheless I see it like this, at some point this was a problem and then someone resolved it and made an API out of it. Linked list structure is commonly known so we could expect from the candidate that he knows what it is, and so what you are actually asking is to see how he designs some structure (even an existing structure in this case), which at some point he certainly will do on the job.

53. DC on 2014-12-13

I was asked a couple of these questions on an Amazon interview about a month ago. The interview went fairly well, although I didn’t get the job. My guess is they ask the questions to get a feel of how you analyze a problem, and your way of coming up with solutions. This also gives a company an idea of your underlying knowledge of a language, and time complexity.

I’m not saying its right or wrong, but I guess it works for the companies who use this method of interviewing.

54. Youchen on 2015-1-4

Great to see this post, Thanks a lot!

55. RA the Guest on 2015-1-22

Did you get the job?

56. scvblwxq on 2015-5-18

What about SQL and GUI programming?

57. Runiko on 2015-6-24

how can develop a software that will easily be convert the algorithm into java?

58. humfff humffff gnarl gnarl . . on 2015-7-31

Joe for president. He knows everything. i will vote you Dude. You seem so relaxed and cool

59. Tom Bombadil on 2015-8-1

Right. And we should remove basic match from schools since we have calculators now.

60. Joe Pepersack on 2015-8-1

Since you can’t even spell “math” correctly, I see no reason to even bother addressing the idiocy and irrelevence of your comment.

61. Rajneesh Chaturvedi on 2015-8-18

can any one tell me from following code that last inner loop should run infinitely but it is running fine why :

class Pyramid{
public static void main(String args[])
{
int i=0,j=0,k=0,l=0;
for(i=1;ii;j–)
{
System.out.print(” “);
}
for(k=i;k>=1;k–)
{
System.out.print(“”+k);
}
for(l=2;l>1;l++) (it should run infinitely but it is running fine )
{

if(l<=i)
System.out.print(""+l);

}
System.out.println("");

}

}

}

62. Pierre Wang on 2015-9-10

when l = Integer.MAX_VALUE, then l + 1 =0

63. java_an on 2015-9-23

visit string program for interview

64. Holden on 2015-9-24

I am really curious what was that! 🙂

65. Raul Astudillo on 2015-9-30

I’ve recently arrived to the US and I’m having this huge struggle with interviews for the same thing. I had three interviews where recruiters liked my profile to be later rejected by indian technical reviewers because I can’t implement over the phone a hashmap.

I’m really tired to be treated like a google search client over the phone for things that can be easily solved by a 10 second search on google.

I have 6 years working as a programmer and 4 of those years working at IBM Chile so I think I can do just fine without knowing letter by letter those algorithms (and I haven’t even used any of those because frameworks already implement them).

66. Mamta Ajay Rai on 2015-10-24

Good Article .Good point ‘Joe Pepersack’ agreed.

67. Ashwin on 2015-10-27

Appreciate your effort getting the algorithms , its fun to ponder over the questions and try solving it, weather of or not to be asked in interview , I like to go through the subjects u have shared.

68. a on 2015-11-2

irrelevance*

69. Nathaniel Talcott on 2015-11-6

“I’ve seen more than enough people coming from university trying to solve
everything with recursion – resulting in bad to read, slow and memory
expensive code.”

Yeah, what do those University assholes know anyway?

“Every recursion creates a copy of the recursive function
in memory(in most languages). And recursion almost always is slower
than the iterative solution.”

This statement is incorrect. When you do tail recursion there is no reason to create a new stack frame.

When you say that “most” languages can’t do [tail recursion] you’re wrong. C and C++ optimize for tail recursion and, in most non-contrived cases, will execute a properly implemented recursive function faster and with less memory than a comparable iterative function.

Java and C# do not have the optimization for tail recursion because they’re being compiled just in time (JIT)… the JIT process doesn’t allow time to perform the tail recursion optimization this feature was never implemented in these languages.

There is a reason it is a bad idea to use Java for real-time or embedded applications. Not only does the JIT process prevent optimization… but in every instance where the Java creators had to choose between performance and safety (by which I mean preventing the developer from making stupid mistakes) the Java creators always erred on the side of preventing stupid mistakes.

70. Shivam Singh on 2015-12-4

Nice algorithms…. visit more Coding interview questions

71. vin_it on 2015-12-7

What was that!! 😮

72. Mike on 2016-1-27

Good point!

73. Sergey Muravyov on 2016-2-2

THX a lot for this post, really useful, especially for closed issues from leet!

74. Maya on 2016-2-5

Thanks for your solution. There are lots of new question in leetcode now, please update.

75. mary joe on 2016-3-28

Thx OP for compiling a great list of interview questions! They are very commonly seen in those big 4 compaines.

76. mary joe on 2016-3-28

You are a very ignorant yet highly arrogant person and I cant believe there are so many idiots give u plus ones i bet there are many losers out there who got rejected by google or facebook. I have checked your resume and the company that you worked for is nothing impressive. Yes it is a bad practice to reinvent the wheels in real life, but does it necessarily mean it a bad pratice to ask those questions in interview? Why are the universites all over the world teach calculus, linear algebra, differential equations? Will those subjects really be used in real life, by your logic by bother learning all of those, why dont the universtisy dump all the theoretical courses anyway. I am pretty sure that you are not more than an average programmer, just becauser you are not good at it and you cant work for google or mircosoft doesnt mean those questions are horriable. I just cant stand incompetent people bullshiting here and pretend to be pro.

77. Malleus Veritas on 2016-3-31

The criticism of someone who cannot use proper grammar, punctuation, and capitalization is so stinging. Consider me rebuked by your rapier-keen insight.

The unskilled often mistake competence and confidence for arrogance because they lack the skill to tell the difference.

Bottom line is that if you want to hire the right people, you need to ask the right questions. Questions that test the candidate’s ability to regurgitate facts they learned by rote are not the right questions. Questions that demonstrate the candidate’s ability to apply that knowledge are.

78. Keith Moon on 2016-4-9

Irrelevance, you mean. I agree with your basic premise about the uselessness of implementing a linked list, but your arrogance is grating. If you are going to make the argument that you aren’t going to listen to the arguments made by someone who cannot spell properly, or use proper punctuation, grammar, and capitalization, it is ironic that you can’t spell either. Or maybe it was just a typo, like the “match” in question.

“I’ve interviewed with industry-leading companies.
I’ve worked for industry-leading companies.
I’ve interviewed candidates for industry-leading companies.”

I am not sure if you are trolling or not, but in the last 6 months I have been asked multiple questions from this list by Google, Microsoft, and Amazon. To give them credit, they didn’t care if I recalled the correct method names for STL or Collections classes and methods, but the questions were from this list. Regardless of how useful these problems are in real life (they are not that useful mostly), they are useful just for the purpose of interviews.

79. airjordan919 on 2016-4-17

As I see, a lot of these questions are actually not asking you to reinvent wheels but testing your ability to design efficient and simple algorithms as well as using appropriate data structures.

80. 3D on 2016-4-19

Could you please update the PDF version to the latest 2016. 03. 19. as well?

Thank you!

81. ryanlr on 2016-4-24

PDF updated now. Thanks!

82. 3D on 2016-4-25

Thank you!

83. Anjali on 2016-5-1

Programming Problem List
http://www.binarycoder.org/484-2/

84. Java Developer on 2016-5-13

Unfortunately, these questions are being asked to Fresh graduates and Seniors alike. Last few months I attended 10+ interviews. All started with a phone interview on laptop with naive editor where they expect you to even remember all syntax. Interviewers are expecting you to solve these types of questions in 30 minutes with best possible algorithm. In real world, best algorithms evolve.

You can clear these interviews only if you have exclusively prepared for these companies and type of questions. Once interview is cleared, all these companies are same old crap.

Google, Facebook, linkedin, amazon, ebay – all of them do it same way.

Even worse – startups are giving coding project and round zero screening than do next rounds as coding. Waste almost 1 full day in interview and reject most people wasting everyone’s time.

Here is a good read from Jeff Atwood – http://blog.codinghorror.com/we-hire-the-best-just-like-everyone-else/

85. Om Shankar on 2016-5-24

Can you give any example of your statement? How many horrible programmers you know who ended up being in Google, Netflix, etc. – they all take puzzle, algorithms, and such interviews. By now, Google, Facebook, Netflix, LinkedIn, Apple, etc. have the best programmers. Hence they are the best companies.

For your solution, “I’d develop in a language which supports lists natively” – you take for granted that the language exists, and it can exec a Linked List. Whoa!! Someone intelligent has to create that first, right? for it to exist, for you to then use it!

Referring your comment below, industry leading companies – might not be the companies who create things. For eg., Accenture/ServiceNow, etc. are industry leading companies for the “Service Industry”. How many patents have they filed?

Compare them to patents filed by Google, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.

Industry leading companies usually want to “pick up the best reference and implement it” – like you said. But who creates those as references?
Someone should create a masterpiece, to be chosen and used by others.

Companies like Google, Facebook, etc. “create” things. And that’s why they are fair in taking such interview.

Experience of XYZ yrs, is an important thing, very important. But “raw intelligence” is also very important. Both go hand in hand. Companies that are shaping the technology around us, want to be sure that they are hiring intelligent people. So that, when some entirely new problem has to be solved (which can’t be solved with previous experience), it can be done.

86. Anshul Goel on 2016-6-1

Perfect

87. Róbert Papp on 2016-6-6

Hmm, I know it’s not the point here, but I wouldn’t accept Stack as an answer: it’s synchronised and based on Vector. This may have been the answer way back more than 10 years ago, today a better answer may be: use ArrayDeque or LinkedList instance though the Deque interface, but one should be able to whip one up from scratch on request, because it’s so simple.

88. Walt Corey on 2016-6-7

Perhaps but that wasn’t the question Bob. I completely disagree with your conclusion. Too many professional developers forget they are paid to write software, generally for sale, not rewrite the language in their own image.

This is a derivative of,
1) get it working.
2) get it working correctly.
3) If, and only if, there is a performance problem in that piece of code, optimize the implementation.

If they wanted to know how to implement a DeQueue that should/would have been the question.

The meta answer I gave was I do not reinvent the language unless I absolutely need to. And that was two years ago….c’mon dude.

89. Cherry Zhao on 2016-7-12

This is a great post. I like that it includes almost all the common topics asked in coding interviews. I also like to share this blog about coding interview questions – http://blog.gainlo.co/index.php/category/coding-interview-questions/

90. Juan Carlos Alvarez on 2016-10-10

Preach it brother!.

91. Prathiksha Gowda on 2016-11-22

If you guys think this is not the best website for the interview questions. Can you please suggest a website where we have good questions? Since I am new to programming and desperately looking for a job in US suggest me where I can look for interview questions and prepare well.

92. nashlalala on 2016-11-23

I found the questions here very good. It is clear to use library when necessary, they are the basics for software developers. These questions are difficult and one needs to be really clever to get most of them. Google, Facebook, Microsoft etc., the top companies want GENIUS, not senior developers or good developers. I have some uni colleges working in Google, Apple, Microsoft, they are all perfectly good in those algorithms and are top developers. These questions are the ladders for them to clime up higher than most of the developers.

93. nashlalala on 2016-11-23

That is why only the top developers have to chance to developer libraries and the normal ones can only use them.

94. Namik on 2016-12-6

At Facebook/Google you earn more than this on a regular basis

95. Hogan Freeman on 2017-1-2

The new Leetcode has more than 400 problems. When would this website get updated ? It would be really nice to get the synced version.

96. Róbert Papp on 2017-1-2

You can find solutions for each of those problems in their corresponding discussion forums.

97. Raj on 2017-1-3

I think this is a great list of problems to practice for coding interviews.

It would be nice if the admin could rearrage the leetcode questions in the list into (Easy/Medium/Hard) based on the difficulty level given on leetcode.

Thanks!

98. Rishabh Bharti on 2017-2-4

Tell me something , does companies like Amazon , Google etc ever ask suck questions for coding round?

99. Rishabh Bharti on 2017-2-4

Nope ! its n^1.6. Don’t go with the bookish knowledge , try to do it yourself , you will see the answer 🙂

100. Sharvin Shaji on 2017-2-24

interview question

One mismatch
Max. Marks: 100
Given a string
s
s and a set of
n
n strings
p
i
pi.

For each
i
i find the number of occurrences of
p
i
pi in
s
s with at most one
k
k-length gap.

The string
s
s occurs in string
t
t at position
p
p with at most one
k
k-length gap if strings
s
s and
t
p
t
p
+
1

t
p
+
|
s
|

1
tptp+1…tp+|s|−1 are equal with at most one
k
k-length gap.

Strings
s
s and
r
r are equal with at most one
k
k-length gap if:

|
s
|
=
|
r
|
|s|=|r|;
or all
i
i and
j
j such that
s
i

r
i
si≠ri and
s
j

r
j
sj≠rj, it holds
|
i

j
|
<
k
|i−j|<k.
Input format

First line of input contains single integer
k
k (
1

k

2

10
5
1≤k≤2⋅105).

Second line of input contains string
s
s (
1

|
s
|

2

10
5
1≤|s|≤2⋅105).

Third line contains an integer
n
n (
1

n

2

10
5
1≤n≤2⋅105).

Then follow
n
n lines. The
i
i-th of them contains string
p
i
pi (
n

i
=
1

|
p
i
|

2

10
5
∑i=1n|pi|≤2⋅105).

s
s and
p
i
pi can contain characters with codes from
33
33 to
126
126, inclusive.

Output format

Print
n
n lines. The
i
i-th of them should contain the number of occurrences
p
i
pi in
s
s with at most one
k
k-length gap.

SAMPLE INPUT
1
abc
3
ac
b
acb
SAMPLE OUTPUT
2
3
0
Explanation
"ac" equals "ab" and "bc"
"b" equals "a", "b" and "c"
"acb" doesn't equal "abc"

101. Top Coder on 2017-3-11
102. Bhuwan Tripathi on 2017-3-12

I go throw your whole web site and i wanna appreciate your efforts. You have brilliantly done the job, hats off to you man. Awesome website and fabulous content. Very nice good job.

Thanks

103. Stephen Boesch on 2017-3-27

Do you really believe your own comment here? Oh.. apparently you do .. I could not agree much less. The areas in which I can build something from scratch OR from existing libraries are the areas counted as strengths. Knowing the libraries also means understanding what the limitations and optimal use cases are – which typically means referencing the source code – which is easier to do when you know the general outline of how to implement it yourself. Instead it is easy to stay “at a certain level” above the fray – and have no idea how to get into the guts if required. And yes I have worked for (and interviewed for..) Google, Apple, IBM Research, Nokia, ..

104. maniac87 on 2017-4-5

Although I do agree on some parts, following your comment is the shortcut for exit door of the company you are interviewing

105. Stephen Boesch on 2017-4-8

Updated: yes you are right. Malleus has nary a clue.

106. Chris on 2017-4-26

Take a look into fresh set of Java interview questions. It could be helpful both for programmers and team-leads as kind of preparing for interview.

107. vmasoft on 2017-4-27

I usually ask during coding interviews a question about recursion. Something like finding the maximum number in a jagged array: http://www.codeavenger.com/2017/04/26/Ask-about-recursion-during-coding-interviews-to-identify-good-talent.html