rflows

This is embedded reactive and typesafe Scala-based DSL for declaring flows using functional composition.

Graph1

To get started with SBT, simply add the following to your build.sbt file:

  resolvers += Resolver.sonatypeRepo("snapshots")
  libraryDependencies += "com.github.dk14" %% "rflows" % "0.2-SNAPSHOT"

Usage examples (tests):

routing - SimpleRouter - defines flows and groups. Тhere is also а before intercеptor (after and log defined as well) that executes before each step (act). You may have a look at ManagableFlows trait if you need automatical timеouts for flows - it will work only for Future-based implementation not for "simple" ones (Act.simple and so on). See RoutingDSL for sources.
metrics - shows how to measure time, spent on each service. Note that time spent for a step itself is measured automatically. All such measurements are tagged with "flowName" tag and each contains a name of current step and service that was executed inside that step, so you need implicitly pass MetricsContext to ensure that service is bound to a step. You can get this context from message iteslf (see withMeta in routing examples).

Flow

sequentially executes several acts, splitters, aggregators or other flows

Routing

To create new application-level flow - just extend InstrumentedRouting trait and define your flow inside:

import api.routing.dsl._
trait Routing1 extends InstrumentedRouting[Request] with MyService1 with MyService2 {
  val Flow1 = Act("act1", handler1) |> Act("act2", handler2) |> 
    Split("split1", splitter1) |> Aggregate("aggregate1", aggregate) |> Act("act6", handler6)
}

handlerN - handler for current flow step

MyServiceN - service-layer used by handlers. It's recommended to inject those services in mix-in style.

So here you can define flow as composition (|>) of acts, splitters and aggregators

Simple Act

just executes a simple processor

Act.simple("act1", handler1)

handler1 takes input message and returns output message

Act

executes a processor and moves to next act or returns a result using Future

Act("act1", handler1)

handler1 takes input message and returns a future of output message, so next act in chain (act2) is executed only when future completes. In combination with scala's Future composition, it gives you a way to acquire asynchronous services and build processing in reactive way.

FlowGroup and SubFlows

groups several sub-flows to be used inside one Split (see below)

implicit object FlowGroup1 extends Group {
  val SubFlow1 = Act("act3", handler3) |> Act("act4", handler4) tagged //do not forget "tagged" word !!
  val SubFlow2 = Act("act5", handler5) tagged
}

You can't mix flows from different groups inside one splitting/routing handler - there is special compiler check to prevent that. Please, don't forget tagged and implicit object - otherwise your splitter won't compile. You can have several groups (implicit object's ) in one scope

Split

allows to split a message into several ones and send each part to its own (dynamically chosen) flow in reactive way. You can also send same message to different flows.

Split("split1", splitter1)

def splitter1(in: Data[Request]) = Seq( //same message, different flows
  Future(in) -> SubFlow1, 
  Future(in) -> SubFlow2
)

def splitter1(in: Data[Request]) = Seq( //different messages, different flows
  Future(in.part1) -> SubFlow1,
  Future(in.part2) -> SubFlow2
)

or just

Split.simple("split1", simpleSplitter)

def simpleSplitter(in: Data[Request]) = Seq(
  in.part1 -> SubFlow1,
  in.part2 -> SubFlow2
)

splitter1 function takes message and returns list of directives, each directive is Future[Message] -> Flow, which means that it contains a new message (might be just a copy of input) and flow to process this message.

All flows (returned by splitter) should be part of same group (see above). For instance, SubFlow1 and SubFlow2 are parts of FlowGroup1 (see the diagram).

Otherwise, you get scary compilation error, which is intentional protection from SubFlow Hell

Route

route process a message and route a result to dynamically chosen flow (in reactive way) Simmilar to Split (it's particular case actually) but route1 returns list with only one directive (message+destination) to process. It can be implemented with same Split construction:

Split("route1", router1)

def router1(in: Data[Request]) = 
  if (in.isForSubFlow1)  
    Seq(Future(in.data) -> SubFlow1) else Seq(Future(in.data) -> SubFlow2)

//or just

Split.route("route", router) = //note that this one doesn't need aggregation
  if (in.isForSubFlow1)  
    in.data -> SubFlow1 else in.data -> SubFlow2

Aggregate

aggregates messages after being split

Split("split1", splitter1) |> Aggregate("aggregate1", aggregator1)

Shoud be placed right after corresponding Split

How to run a flow

it's just a function

Flow1(Seq(incomingMessage1), context)

If you specify several incoming messages, they're going to be processed in parallel (it's like a resuming after Split). Usually you don't need that.

How to run dot-based graph and metrics visualiser:

import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit
import api.routing.metrics._

DefaultMetricsReporter.localReporter.start(1, TimeUnit.SECONDS)

Add visualization actor into your spray-can Boot using MetricsBoot trait :

import api.routing.http._ 

object Boot extends App with MetricsBoot {
   implicit val system = ActorSystem("spray-sample-system")
   IO(Http) ! Http.Bind(metricsService, "localhost", 8080)
}

Terminology

Data

Data is a wrapper around message. It contains the message itself, and also its Context and Meta-info

Context

Context is an object shared between all Flows(like Flow1) that belong to a single Routing (like Routing1). You can specify its type when extending InstrumentedRouting trait (see below) and specify an object itself when passing incoming message to a flow, like Flow(incomingMessage, context) Usually the context is current request, so just Flow(incomingMessage, incomingMessage)

PS

Inspired by Camel, Akka projects. Thanks to Alexander Nemish, Ilya Tkachuk, Vitalij Kotlyarenko for some of ideas.