Tensor2Robot

This repository contains distributed machine learning and reinforcement learning infrastructure.

It is used internally at Alphabet, and open-sourced with the intention of making research at Robotics @ Google more reproducible for the broader robotics and computer vision communities.

Projects and Publications Using Tensor2Robot

Features

Tensor2Robot (T2R) is a library for training, evaluation, and inference of large-scale deep neural networks, tailored specifically for neural networks relating to robotic perception and control. It is based on the TensorFlow deep learning framework.

A common task in robotics research involves adding a new sensor modality or new label tensor to a neural network graph. This involves 1) changing what data is saved, 2) changing data pipeline code to read in new modalities at training time 3) adding a new tf.placeholder to handle the new input modality at test time. The main feature of Tensor2Robot is the automatic generation of TensorFlow code for steps 2 and 3. Tensor2Robot can automatically generate placeholders for a model to match its inputs, or alternatively exports a SavedModel that can be used with a TFExportedSavedModelPolicy so that the original graph does not have to be re-constructed.

Another common task encountered in ML involves cropping / transforming input modalities, such as jpeg-decoding and applying random image distortions at training time. The Preprocessor class declares its own input features and labels, and is expected to output shapes compatible with the input features and labels of the model. Example preprocessors can be found in preprocessors.

Design Decisions

Quickstart

Requirements: Python 3.

git clone https://github.com/google/tensor2robot
# Optional: Create a virtualenv
python3 -m venv ~/venv
source ~/venv/bin/activate
pip install -r tensor2robot/requirements.txt
python -m tensor2robot.research.pose_env.pose_env_test
python -m tensor2robot.research.pose_env.pose_env_models_test

T2RModel

To use Tensor2Robot, a user defines a T2RModel object that define their input requirements by specifications - one for their features (feature_spec) and one for their labels (label_spec):

These specifications define all required and optional tensors in order to call the model_fn. An input pipeline parameterized with the model's input pipeline will ensure that all required specifications are fulfilled. Note: we always omit the batch dimension and only specify the shape of a single element.

At training time, the T2RModel provides model_train_fn or model_eval_fn as the model_fn argument tf.estimator.Estimator class. Both model_train_fn and model_eval_fn are defined with respect to the features, labels, and outputs of inference_network_fn, which presumably implements the shared portions of the train/eval graphs.

class MyModel(T2RModel):
  def get_feature_specification(self, mode):
    spec = tensorspec_utils.TensorSpecStruct()
    spec['state'] = ExtendedTensorSpec(
      shape=(8,128), dtype=tf.float32, name='s')
  def get_label_specification(self, mode):
    spec = tensorspec_utils.TensorSpecStruct()
    spec['action'] = ExtendedTensorSpec(shape=(8), dtype=tf.float32, name='a')
  def inference_network_fn(self,
                           features: tensorspec_utils.TensorSpecStruct,
                           labels: Optional[tensorspec_utils.TensorSpecStruct],
                           mode: tf.estimator.ModeKeys,
                           config: RunConfigType = None,
                           params: ParamsType = None) -> DictOrSpec:
    inference_outputs = {}
    inference_outputs['predictions'] = layers.fully_connected(features.state, 8)
    return inference_outputs
  def model_train_fn(self,
                     features: tensorspec_utils.TensorSpecStruct,
                     labels: tensorspec_utils.TensorSpecStruct,
                     inference_outputs: DictOrSpec,
                     mode: tf.estimator.ModeKeys,
                     config: RunConfigType = None,
                     params: ParamsType = None) -> ModelTrainOutputType:
    """See base class."""
    del features, config
    loss = tf.losses.mean_squared_error(
      labels.action, inference_outputs['predictions'])
    return loss

Note how the key on the left hand side has a value for name that is different from the one on the right hand side within the ExtendedTensorSpec. The key on the left is used within the model_fn to access the loaded tensor whereas the name is used when creating the parse_tf_example_fn or numpy_feed_dict. We ensure that the name is unique within the whole spec, unless the specs match, otherwise we cannot guarantee the mapping functionality.

Benefits of Inheriting a T2RModel

Policies and Placeholders

For performance reasons, policy inference is done by a vanilla session.run() or a predict_fn call on the output of a model, instead of Estimator.predict. tensorspec_utils.make_placeholders automatically creates placeholders from a spec structure which can be used in combination with a matching hierarchy of numpy inputs to create a feed_dict.

# batch_size = -1 -> No batch size will be prepended to the spec.
# batch_size = None -> We will prepend None, have a variable batch_size.
# batch_size > 0 -> We will have a fixed batch_size.
placeholders = tensorspec_utils.make_placeholders(hierarchical_spec, batch_size=None)

feed_dict = inference_model.MakeFeedDict(placeholders, numpy_inputs)
# This can be passed to a sess.run function to evaluate the model.

If you use TFExportedSavedModelPolicy, note that your T2RModel should not query the static batch shape (x.shape[0]) in the graph. This is because placeholder generation creates inputs with unknown batch shape None, causing static shape retrieval to fail. Instead, use tf.shape(x)[0] to access batch shapes dynamically.

Working with Tensor Specifications

Specifications can be a hierarchical data structure of either

The leaf elements have to be of type TensorSpec or ExtendedTensorSpec (preferred). In the following, we will present some examples using ExtendedTensorSec and TensorSpecStruct to illustrate the different usecases.

We use tensorspec_utils.TensorSpecStruct() for specifying specs since this data structure is mutuable, provides attribute (dot) access and item iteration. Further, we can use pytype to ensure compile time type checking. This data structure is both hierarchical and flat: The dictionary interface using .items() is flat representing hierarchical data with paths, as shown later on. However, we maintain a hierarchical interface using attribute access, also shown later on. Therefore, we can use this data structure in order to create and alter hierarchical specifications which work with both TPUEstimator and Estimator since both apis operate on the dictionary view.

Hierarchical example

Creating a hierarchical spec from spec using tensorspec_utils.copy_tensorspec.

simple_spec = tensorspec_utils.TensorSpecStruct()
simple_spec['state'] = ExtendedTensorSpec(
  shape=(8,128), dtype=tf.float32, name='s')
simple_spec['action'] = ExtendedTensorSpec(shape=(8), dtype=tf.float32, name='a')

hierarchical_spec = tensorspec_utils.TensorSpecStruct()
hierarchical_spec.train = tensorspec_utils.copy_tensorspec(simple_spec, prefix=’train’)

Note, we use attribute access to define the train hierarchy. This will copy all our specs from simple_spec internally to

# 'train/{}' -> 'train/state' == simple_spec.state and
# 'train/action' == simple_spec.action

We forbid the following pattern:

hierarchical_spec.train = tensorspec_utils.TensorSpecStruct()

and encourage the user to use this pattern instead.

train = tensorspec_utils.TensorSpecStruct()
train.stuff = ExtendedTensorSpec(...)
hierarchical_spec.train = train
# or
hierarchical_spec['train/stuff'] = ExtendedTensorSpec(...)
# All of the following statements are True.
hierarchical_spec.train.state == simple_spec.state
hierarchical_spec.train.action == simple_spec.action
hierarchical_spec.keys() == ['train/state', 'train/action']
hierarchical_spec.train.keys() == ['state', 'action']

Now we want to use the same spec another time for our input.

hierarchical_spec.val = tensorspec_utils.copy_tensorspec( simple_spec,
  prefix='val')

# All of the following statements are True.
hierarchical_spec.keys() == ['train/state', 'train/action', 'val/state',
   'val/action']
hierarchical_spec.train.keys() == ['state', 'action']
hierarchical_spec.train.state.name == 'train/s'
hierarchical_spec.val.keys() == ['state', 'action']
hierarchical_spec.val.state.name == 'val/s'

Manually extending/creating a hierarchical spec from an existing simple spec is also possible. TensorSpec is an immutable data structure therefore the recommend way to alter a spec is:

hierarchical.train.state = ExtendedTensorSpec.from_spec(
  hierarchical.train.state, ...PARAMETERS TO OVERWRITE)

A different way of changing a hierarchical spec would be:

for key, value in simple_spec.items():
  hierarchical[‘test/’ + key] = ExtendedTensorSpec.from_spec(
    value, name=’something_random/’+value.name)
# hierarchical_spec.keys() == ['train/state', 'train/action', ‘val/state’,
#   ‘val/action’, ‘test/state’, ‘test/action’]
# hierarchical_spec.train.keys() == ['state', 'action']
# hierarchical_spec.val.keys() == ['state', 'action']
# hierarchical_spec.test.keys() == ['state', 'action']
# hierarchical_spec.test.state.name == ‘something_random/s’

Sequential Inputs

Tensor2Robot can parse both tf.train.Example and tf.train.SequenceExample protos (useful for training recurrent models like LSTMs). To declare a model whose data is parsed from SequenceExamples, set is_sequence=True.

spec['state'] = ExtendedTensorSpec(
  shape=(8,128), dtype=tf.float32, name='s', is_sequence=True)

This will result in a parsed tensor of shape (b, ?, 8, 128) where b is the batch size and the second dimension is the unknown sequence length (only known at run-time). Note that if is_sequence=True for any ExtendedTensorSpec in the TensorSpecStruct, the proto will be assumed to be a SequenceExample (and non-sequential Tensors will be assumed to reside in example.context).

Flattening hierarchical specification structures

Any valid spec structure can be flattened into a tensorspec_utils.TensorSpecStruct. In the following we show different hierarchical data structures and the effect of flatten_spec_structure.

flat_hierarchy = tensorspec_utils.flatten_spec_structure(hierarchical)

Note, tensorspec_utils.TensorSpecStruct will have flat dictionary access. We can print/access/change all elements of our spec by iterating over the items.

for key, value in flat_hierarchy.items():
  print('path: {}, spec: {}'.format(key, value))
# This will print:
# path: train/state, spec: ExtendedTensorSpec(
#    shape=(8, 128), dtype=tf.float32, name='train/s')
# path: train/action, spec: ExtendedTensorSpec(
#    shape=(8), dtype=tf.float32, name='train/a')
# path: val/state, spec: ExtendedTensorSpec(
#    shape=(8, 128), dtype=tf.float32, name='val/s')
# path: val/action, spec: ExtendedTensorSpec(
#    shape=(8), dtype=tf.float32, name='val/a')
# path: test/state, spec: ExtendedTensorSpec(
#    shape=(8, 128), dtype=tf.float32, name='something_random/s')
# path: test/action, spec: ExtendedTensorSpec(
#    shape=(8), dtype=tf.float32, name='something_random/a')
# This data structure still maintains the hierarchical user interface.
train = flat_hierarchy.train
for key, value in flat_hierarchy.items():
  print('path: {}, spec: {}'.format(key, value))
# This will print:
# path: state, spec: ExtendedTensorSpec(
#    shape=(8, 128), dtype=tf.float32, name='train/s')
# path: action, spec: ExtendedTensorSpec(
#    shape=(8), dtype=tf.float32, name='train/a')

Note, the path has changed, but the name is still from the hierarchy. This is an important distinction. The model could access the data in a different manner but the same "name" is used to access tf.Examples of feed_dicts in order to feed the tensors.

An alternative hierarchical spec using namedtuples:

Hierarchy = namedtuple('Hierarchy', ['train', 'val'])
Sample = namedtuple('Sample', ['state', 'action'])
hierarchy = Hierarchy(
  train=Sample(
    state=ExtendedTensorSpec(shape=(8, 128), dtype=tf.float32, name='train/s'),
    action=ExtendedTensorSpec(shape=(8), dtype=tf.float32, name='train/a'),
  ),
  eval=Sample(
    state=ExtendedTensorSpec(shape=(8, 128), dtype=tf.float32, name='val/s'),
    action=ExtendedTensorSpec(shape=(8), dtype=tf.float32, name='val/a'),
  )
)
flat_hierarchy = tensorspec_utils.flatten_spec_structure(hierarchy)

for key, value in flat_hierarchy.items():
  print('path: {}, spec: {}'.format(key, value))
# This will print:
# path: train/state, spec: ExtendedTensorSpec(
#    shape=(8, 128), dtype=tf.float32, name='train/s')
# path: train/action, spec: ExtendedTensorSpec(
#    shape=(8), dtype=tf.float32, name='train/a')
# path: val/state, spec: ExtendedTensorSpec(
#    shape=(8, 128), dtype=tf.float32, name='val/s')
# path: val/action, spec: ExtendedTensorSpec(
#    shape=(8), dtype=tf.float32, name='val/a')

Note, hierarchy (namedtuple) is immutable whereas flat_hierarchy is a mutable instance of TensorSpecStruct.

Validate and flatten or pack

tensorspec_utils.validate_and_flatten and tensorspec_utils.validate_and_pack allow to verify that an existing, e.g. loaded spec data structure filled with tensors fulfills our expected spec structure and is flattened or packed into a hierarchical structure.

Disclaimer

This is not an official Google product. External support not guaranteed. The API may change subject to Alphabet needs. File a GitHub issue if you have questions.