/* * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more * contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership. * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0 * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at * * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 * * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and * limitations under the License. */ package org.apache.solr.util; import java.util.Arrays; import java.util.List; import org.apache.lucene.util.Constants; import org.apache.solr.SolrTestCase; public class TestSSLTestConfig extends SolrTestCase { /** Sanity check that our JVM version parsing logic seems correct */ public void testIsOpenJdkJvmVersionKnownToHaveProblems() { final List<String> rel_suffixes = Arrays.asList("", "+42"); final List<String> ea_suffixes = Arrays.asList("-ea", "-ea+42"); final List<String> suffixes = Arrays.asList("", "+42", "-ea", "-ea+42"); // as far as we know, any Java 8, 9 or 10 impl should be fine... for (String base : Arrays.asList("1.8", "1.8.0", "1.8.1", "9", "9.0", "9.1", "9.0.0", "9.1.0", "9.1.1", "10", "10.0", "10.1", "10.0.0", "10.1.0", "10.1.1")) { for (String suffix : suffixes) { final String v = base + suffix; assertFalse(v, SSLTestConfig.isOpenJdkJvmVersionKnownToHaveProblems(v)); } } // Known Problems start with Java 11... // java 11 releases below 11.0.3 were all bad... for (String bad : Arrays.asList("11", "11.0", "11.0.1", "11.0.2")) { for (String suffix : suffixes) { final String v = bad + suffix; assertTrue(v, SSLTestConfig.isOpenJdkJvmVersionKnownToHaveProblems(v)); } } // ...but 11.0.3 or higher should be ok. for (String ok : Arrays.asList("11.0.3", "11.0.42", "11.1", "11.1.42")) { for (String suffix : suffixes) { final String v = ok + suffix; assertFalse(v, SSLTestConfig.isOpenJdkJvmVersionKnownToHaveProblems(v)); } } // As far as we know/hope, all "official" java 12 and higher impls should be fine... for (String major : Arrays.asList("12", "13", "99")) { for (String minor : Arrays.asList("", ".0", ".42", ".0.42")) { for (String suffix : rel_suffixes) { final String v = major + minor + suffix; assertFalse(v, SSLTestConfig.isOpenJdkJvmVersionKnownToHaveProblems(v)); } } } // ...but pre EA "testing" builds of 11, 12, and 13 are all definitely problematic... for (String major : Arrays.asList("11", "12", "13")) { for (String suffix : suffixes) { final String v = major + "-testing" + suffix; assertTrue(v, SSLTestConfig.isOpenJdkJvmVersionKnownToHaveProblems(v)); } } // ...and all 13-ea builds (so far) have definitely been problematic. for (String suffix : ea_suffixes) { final String v = "13" + suffix; assertTrue(v, SSLTestConfig.isOpenJdkJvmVersionKnownToHaveProblems(v)); } } public void testFailIfUserRunsTestsWithJVMThatHasKnownSSLBugs() { // NOTE: If there is some future JVM version, where all available "ea" builds are known to be buggy, // but we still want to be able to use for running tests (ie: via jenkins) to look for *other* bugs, // then those -ea versions can be "white listed" here... try { SSLTestConfig.assumeSslIsSafeToTest(); } catch (org.junit.AssumptionViolatedException ave) { fail("Current JVM (" + Constants.JVM_NAME + " / " + Constants.JVM_VERSION + ") is known to have SSL Bugs. Other tests that (explicitly or via randomization) " + " use SSL will be SKIPed"); } } }